Reading+List

Reading list for Heterodox Microeconomics

Note: First compiled on February 19, 2011. This list is based on Fred Lee’s Doctoral Microeconomics Syllabus and Tae-Hee Jo’s personal database. Download the pdf version of this list [|here].

toc =1. History and Methodology of Heterodox Microeconomics=


 * 1) Bortis, H. 1997. //Institutions, Behaviour and Economic Theory: A Contribution to Classical–Keynesian Political Economy//. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chs. 1, 2, and 5.
 * 2) Bryant, A. And Charmaz, K. (eds) 2007. //The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory//. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, chs. 1, 4, 5, 8, 11, 20, 27
 * 3) Dopfer, K. and Potts, J. 2008. //The General Theory of Economic Evolution//. Routledge, London.
 * 4) Dopfer, K.; Foster, J. and Potts, J. 2004. Micro-meso-macro. //Journal of Evolutionary Economics// 14(3), 263-279.
 * 5) Downward, P.M. 2003. //Applied Economics and the Critical Realist Critique//. London: Routledge. chs. 1–10.
 * 6) Dugger, W. M. 1996. Redefining Economics: from market allocation to social provisioning, in C. Whalen (ed.) //Political Economy for the 21st Century: contemporary views on the trends of economics//, 31–43, Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
 * 7) Eichner, A. S. 1983. //Why Economics is not Yet a Science//. M.E. Sharpe, New York.
 * 8) Eichner, A. S. 1985. Towards an Empirically Valid Economics. //Eastern Economic Journal// XI(4), 437-449.
 * 9) Eichner, A. S. and Kregel, J. A. 1975. An Essay on Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics. //Journal of Economic Literature// 13(4), 1293-1314.
 * 10) Eichner, A. S., ed. 1979. //A Guide to Post-Keynesian Economics//. M.E. Sharpe.
 * 11) Elsner, W. 2007. Why meso? On ‘aggregation’ and ‘emergence’ and why and how the meso level is essential in social economics. //Forum for Social Economics// 36(1), 1-16.
 * 12) Finch, J. H. 2002. The Role of Grounded Theory in Developing Economic Theory. //Journal of Economic Methodology// 9.2: 213 – 234.
 * 13) Fullbrook, E., ed. 2002. //Intersubjectivity in Economics//, Routledge.
 * 14) Glasser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967). //The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research//. Chicago, IL.
 * 15) Henry, J. F. 1984-85. On Equilibrium. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 6(2), 214-229.
 * 16) Henry, J. F. 1986. On economic theory and the question of solvability. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 8(3), 371-386.
 * 17) Lawson, T. 2003. //Reorienting Economics//. London: Routledge, chs. 1–4, 6,10.
 * 18) Lee, F.S. 2009. //A History of Heterodox Economics//. London: Routledge.
 * 19) Lee, F. S. 2002. Theory Creation and the Methodological Foundation of Post Keynesian Economics. //Cambridge Journal of Economics// 26, 789-804.
 * 20) Lee, F. S. 2002. Post Keynesian Economics (1930-2000): An Emerging Heterodox Economic Theory of Capitalism, in Douglas Dowd, ed., //Understanding Capitalism//. Pluto Press, London, UK.
 * 21) Lee, F. S. 2005. Teaching Heterodox Microeconomics. //post-autistic economics review// 31, 26-39.
 * 22) Lee, F. S. 2008.Heterodox Economics, in Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume, ed., //The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics//, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
 * 23) Lee, F. S. 2010. A heterodox teaching of neoclassical microeconomic theory. //International Journal of Economics and Education// 1(3), 203-235.
 * 24) Lee, F. S. and Samuels, W. J., ed. (1992). //The Heterodox Economics of Gardiner C. Means: A Collection//. M.E. Sharpe.
 * 25) Locke, K. 2001. //Grounded Theory in Management Research//. London: SAGE Publications, chs. 1–7.
 * 26) Lutz, M. A. 1999. //Economics for the Common Good: Two Centuries of Social Economic Thought in the Humanistic Tradition//. Routledge, London, UK.
 * 27) McDermott, J. 2003. //Economics in Real Time: A Theoretical Reconstruction//. The University of Michigan Press.
 * 28) Polanyi, K. 1968. The Economy as Instituted Process, in George Dalton, ed., //Primitive, Archaic and Modern Economies: Essays of Karl Polanyi//, A Doubleday Anchor Original, Garden City. NY, pp. 139-174.
 * 29) Power, M. 2004. Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics. //Feminist Economics// 10(3), 3-19.
 * 30) Rosenberg, A. 2001. The metaphysics of microeconomics, in Uskali Maki, ed., //The Economic World View: Studies in the Ontology of Economics//, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 174-188.
 * 31) Shapiro, N. 1977. The Revolutionary Character of Post Keynesian Economics. //Journal of Economic Issues 11 (3), pp. 541-560.//
 * 32) Spiethoff, A. 1952, The ‘Historical’ Character of Economic Theories. //Journal of Economic History// 12.2 (Spring): 131–9
 * 33) Stevenson, R. E. 1987. Institutional Economics and the Theory of Production. //Journal of Economic Issues// 21.4: 1471–1493.

=2. Critiques of Mainstream Microeconomics=
 * 1) Ackerman, F. 2005. Priceless Benefits, Costly Mistakes: What’s Wrong With Cost-Benefit Analysis? //post-autistic economics review// 25.
 * 2) Bougrine, H.; Parker, I. and Seccareccia, M., ed. 2010. //Introducing Microeconomic Analysis: Issues, Questions, and Competing Views//. Edmond Montgomery Publications, Toronto.
 * 3) Carter, M. R. 1985. A Wisconsin Institutionalist Perspective on Microeconomic Theory of Institutions: The Insufficiency of Pareto Efficiency. //Journal of Economic Issues// XIX(3), 797-813.
 * 4) Guerrien, B. 2002. Once Again on Microeconomics. //post-autistic economics review// 16.
 * 5) Henry, J. F. 1990. //The Making of Neoclassical Economics//. Unwin Hyman, Boston, MA.
 * 6) Henry, J. F. 1999. Property Rights, Markets and Economic Theory: Keynes versus Neoclassicism–again. Review of Political Economy11(2), 151-170.
 * 7) Henry, J. F. 2007. “Bad” Decisions, Poverty, and Economic Theory: The Individualist and Social Perspectives in Light of “The American Myth”. //Forum for Social Economics// 36, 17-27.
 * 8) Henry, J. F. 2009. The Illusion of the Epoch: Neoclassical Economics as a Case Study. //Studi e Note di Economia// 1.
 * 9) Keen, S. 2002. //Debunking Economics//. Zed Books, London and New York.
 * 10) Lee, F. S. 1981. The Oxford Challenge to Marshallian Supply and Demand: The history of the Oxford Economists’ Research Group. //Oxford Economic Papers// 33(3), 339-351.
 * 11) Lee, F. S. and Keen, S. 2004. The Incoherent Emperor: A Heterodox Critique of Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory. //Review of Social Economy// 62(2), 169-199.
 * 12) Pessali, H. and Fernandez, R. 1999. Institutional Economics at the Micro Level? What Transaction Costs Theory Could Learn from Original Institutionalism (In the Spirit of Building Bridges). //Journal of Economic Issues// 33(2), 265-275.
 * 13) Prasch, R. E. 2009. //How Markets Work: Supply, Demand and the ‘Real World’//. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA.
 * 14) Richardson, G. B. 1990. //Information and Investment//. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
 * 15) Veblen, T. B. 1909. The Limitations of Marginal Utility. //Journal of Political Economy// 17(9), 620-636.

=3. Principles of Heterodox Microeconomic Theory=
 * 1) Davies, J. E. and Lee, F. S. 1988. A Post Keynesian Appraisal of the Contestability Criterion. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 11(1), 3-25.
 * 2) Davis, J. B. 2003. //The theory of individual in economics: identify and value//. Routledge, New York.
 * 3) De Gregori, T. R. 1987. Resources are Not; They Become: An Institutional Theory. //Journal of Economic Issues// 21.3 (September): 1241 – 1263.
 * 4) Dopfer, K. 2004. The economic agent as rule maker and rule user: Homo Sapiens Oeconomicus. //Journal of Evolutionary Economics// 14(2), 177-195.
 * 5) Katzner, D. W. 2001. The significance, success, and failure of microeconomic theory. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 24(1), 41-58.
 * 6) Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. 2000. Classical Roots of Input–Output Analysis: A Short Account of its Long Prehistory. //Economic Systems Research// 12.2: 153 – 179.
 * 7) Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. 2005. Representing the Production and Circulation of Commodities in Material Terms: On Sraffa’s Objectivism. Review of Political Economy17.3 (July): 69 – 97.
 * 8) Lee, F. S. 1998. //Post Keynesian Price Theory//. Cambridge University Press, chs. 11, 12.
 * 9) Matthaei, J. 1984. Rethinking Scarcity: Neoclasscism, NeoMalthusianism, and NeoMarxism. //Review of Radical Political Economics// 16(2/3), 81-94.
 * 10) Pasinetti, L. L. 2005. From Pure Theory to Full Economic AnalysisA Place for the Economic Agent. //Cachiers d’économie politique// 2(49), 211-216.
 * 11) Reynolds, P. J. 1987. //Political Economy: A Synthesis of Kaleckian and Post Keynesian Economics//. Wheatsheaf Books, Sussex, UK.
 * 12) Reynolds, P. J. 1996. Kalecki’s Theory of Prices and Distribution, in J.E. King, ed., //An Alternative Macroeconomics Theory: The Kaleckian Model and Post-Keynesian Economics//. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 73-91.
 * 13) Robinson, J. V. 1953. The Production Function and the Theory of Capital. //Review of Economic Studies// 15(2), 81-106.
 * 14) Robinson, J. V. 1980. Time in economic theory. //Kyklos// 33, 219-229.
 * 15) Samuels, W. J. and Medema, S. G. 1990. //Gardiner C. Means: Institutionalist and Post Keynesian//. M.E. Sharpe.
 * 16) Sawyer, M. C. 1985. //The Economics of Michal Kalecki//. M.E. Sharpe.
 * 17) Sivramkrishna, S. 2003. Towards a Post-Autistic Managerial Economics. //post-autistic economics review// 20.
 * 18) Sraffa, P. 1926. The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions. //The Economic Journal// 36(144), 535-550.
 * 19) Sraffa, P. 1960. //Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities//. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 * 20) Steindl, J. 1952. //Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism// Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
 * 21) Steindl, J. 1990. Kalecki's Theory of Pricing: Notes on the Margin, in J. Steindl, //Economic Papers, 1941-88.// New York: St. Martin's Press.
 * 22) Varoufakis, Y. 2008. Capitalism According to Evolutionary Game Theory: The Impossibility of a Sufficiently Evolutionary Model of Historical Change. //Science and Society// 72(1), 63-94.
 * 23) Villena, M. G. and Villena, M. J. 2004. Evolutionary Game Theory and Thorstein Veblen’s Evolutionary Economics: Is EGT Veblenian? //Journal of Economic Issues// XXXVIII(3), 585-610.

=4. Nature of the Business Enterprise=
 * 1) Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C. 1968. //The Modern Corporation and Private Property//. Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., New York.
 * 2) Cornehls, J. V. 2004. Veblen’s Theory of Finance Capitalism and Contemporary Corporate America. //Journal of Economic Issues// 38(1), 29-57.
 * 3) Cyert, R. and March, J. (1964). //A Behavioral Theory of The Firm//. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey.
 * 4) Dallery, T. 2009. Post-Keynesian Theories of the Firm under Financialization. //Review of Radical Political Economics// 41(4), 492-515.
 * 5) Dunn, S. P. 2001. An Investigation into a Post Keynesian contribution to the Theory of the Firm. PhD thesis, University of Leeds.
 * 6) Dunn, S. P. 2002. A Post Keynesian Approach to the Theory of the Firm, in Sheila C. Dow, ed., //Post Keynesian Economics, Microeconomics and the Theory of the Firm//. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
 * 7) Eichner, A. S. 1976. //The Megacorp and Oligopoly: Micro Foundations of Macro Dynamics//. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 * 8) Fligstein, N. 1990. //The Transformation of Corporate Control//. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
 * 9) Granovetter, M. 1995. Business Groups, in N.J. Smelser and R. Swedberg, ed., //Handbook of Economic Sociology//. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 453-475.
 * 10) Herman, E. S. 1981. //Corporate Control, Corporate Power//. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chs. 1, 2.
 * 11) Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. 2004. The firm as an interactor: firms as vehicles for habits and routines. //Journal of Evolutionary Economics// 14, 281-307.
 * 12) Moss, S. 1981. //An Economic Theory of Business Strategy//. New York: John Wiley and Sons, ch. 2.
 * 13) Penrose, E. T. 1959. //The Theory of the Growth of the Firm//. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
 * 14) Prechel, H. 2000. //Big Business and the State: Historical Transactions and Corporate Transformation, 1880s-1990s//. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
 * 15) Shapiro, N. 1990. The “Megacorp”: Eichner’s Contribution to the Theory of Firm. //Journal of Economic Issues// 24 (2), 493-500.
 * 16) Shapiro, N. 1991. Firms, Markets, and Innovation. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 14 (1), 49-60.
 * 17) Veblen, T. B. 1904. //The Theory of Business Enterprise//. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York.
 * 18) Veblen, T. B. 1964. //Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times: The Case of America//. Sentry Press, New York.

=5. Structure of Production and Costs of the Business Enterprise=
 * 1) Bortis, H. 1990. Structure and change within the circular theory of production, in Mauro Baranzini and Roberto Scazzieri, ed., //The Economic Theory of Structure and Change//. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 64-92.
 * 2) Dean, J. 1976. //Statistical Cost Estimation//. Bloomington: Indiana University Press,“Introduction to Part I”.
 * 3) Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. 1995. //Theory of Production: A Long-Period Analysis//. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 * 4) Lee, F. S. 1986. Post Keynesian View of Average Direct Costs: A Critical Evaluation of the Theory and the Empirical Evidence. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 8(3), 400-424.
 * 5) Morroni, M. 1992. //Production Process and Technical Change//. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 * 6) Pasinetti, L. L. 1977. //Lectures on the Theory of Production//. Columbia University Press, New York.

=6. Costing, Pricing, and Prices=
 * 1) Boggio, L. 1985. On the stability of production prices. //Metroeconomica// 37(3), 241-267.
 * 2) Coutts, K., G. W. and Nordhaus, W. 1978. //Industrial Pricing in the United Kingdom//. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
 * 3) Downward, P. M. 2009. Prices, in Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren, ed., //Handbook of Economics and Ethics//. Edward Elgar, 399-406.
 * 4) Downward, P. M. 2001. Price Stickiness: A Post Keynesian Microeconomic Perspective. //Eastern Economic Journal// 27, 165-?.
 * 5) Downward, P. M. 2000. A Realist Appraisal of Post Keynesian Pricing Theory. //Cambridge Journal of Economics// 24.2 (March): 211–224.
 * 6) Downward, P. M. 1999. //Pricing Theory in Post Keynesian Economics: A Realist Approach//. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, chs. 3–8.
 * 7) Downward, P. M. and Lee, F. S. 2001. Post Keynesian Pricing Theory “Reconsidered”? A Critical Review of Asking About Prices. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 23(3), 465-483.
 * 8) Eichner, A. 1976. //The Megacorp and Oligopoly//. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ch. 3.
 * 9) Fabiani, S. et. al. 2007. Pricing Decisions in the Euro Area: How Firms set Prices and Why. Oxford: Oxford University Press, parts I and II.
 * 10) Hall, S, Walsh, M., and Yates, A. 2000. Are UK Companies’ Prices Sticky? //Oxford Economic Papers// 52.3 (July): 425 – 446.
 * 11) Harcourt, G. C. and Kenyon, P. 1976. Pricing and the investment decision. //Kyklos// 29(3), 449-77.
 * 12) Lavoie, M. 2001. Pricing, in R. P. F. Holt and S. Pressman (eds.), //A New Guide to Post Keynesian Economics//, 21–31. London: Routledge.
 * 13) Lee, F. S. 1985. Full Cost prices, classical price theory, and long period method analysis: a critical evaluation. //Metroeconomica// XXXVII, 199-219.
 * 14) Lee, F. S. 1994. From Post Keynesian to Historical Price Theory, Part 1: Facts, Theory and Empirically Grounded Pricing Model. Review of Political Economy6(3), 303-336.
 * 15) Lee, F. S. 1996. Pricing, the Pricing model and Post-Keynesian Price Theory. Review of Political Economy8(1), 87-99.
 * 16) Lee, F. S. 1996. Pricing and the Business Enterprise, in Charles J. Whalen, ed., //Political Economy for the 21st Century: Contemporary Views on the Trend of Economics//. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, pp. 87-102.
 * 17) Lee, F. S. 1998. //Post Keynesian Price Theory//. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K..
 * 18) Lee, F. S. and Downward, P. (1999), ’Restesting Gardiner Means’s Evidence on Administered Prices’, //Journal of Economic Issues// 33(4), 861-886.
 * 19) Melmies, J. 2010. New-Keynesians Versus Post-Keynesians on the Theory of Prices. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 32(3), 445-466.
 * 20) Nichols, M., Pavlov, O. and Radzicki, M. J. 2006. The Circular and Cumulative Structure of Administered Pricing. //Journal of Economic Issues// XL(2), 517-526.
 * 21) Roncaglia, A. 1978. //Sraffa and the Theory of Prices//. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
 * 22) Sawyer, M. C. 1983. //Business Pricing and Inflation//. Macmillan Press, London, UK.
 * 23) Setterfield, M. 1996. A note on mark-up pricing and the distribution of income. //Review of Political Economy// 8(1), 79-85.
 * 24) Shapiro, N. 1981. Pricing and the Growth of the Firm. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 4(1), 85-100.
 * 25) Shapiro, N. and M. Sawyer 2003. Post Keynesian Price Theory. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 25 (3), 355-366.
 * 26) Veblen, T. B. 1921. //The Engineers and the Price System//. The Viking Press, New York.

=7. Investment, Employment, and Production=
 * 1) Baddeley, M. C. 2003. //Investment: Theories and Analysis//. Houndsmills: Palgrave.
 * 2) Bewley, T. F. 1999. //Why Wages Don’t Fall During a Recession//. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
 * 3) Dzarasov, R. 2011. Eichnerian megacorpand investment behavior of Russian corporations. //Cambridge Journal of Economics// 35, 199-217
 * 4) Holt, R. P. F. And Pressman, S. 2007. //Empirical Post Keynesian Economics//, M.E. Sharpe, chs. 6–9.
 * 5) Lavoie, M., Rochon, L.-P., and Seccareccia, M. 2010. //Money and Macrodynamics//. M.E. Sharpe, chs. 3, 4
 * 6) López, J. and Mott, T. 1999. Kalecki Versus Keynes on the Determinants of Investment. //Review of Political Economy//11(3), 291-301.
 * 7) Moss, S. 1981. //An Economic Theory of Business Strategy//. New York: John Wiley and Sons, chs. 3, 8.
 * 8) Scheibl, F. and Wood, A. 2005. Investment Sequencing in the Brick Industry: An Application of Grounded Theory. //Cambridge Journal of Economics// 29.2 (March): 223–247.

=8. Households=
 * 1) Todorova, Z. 2009. //Money and Households in a Capitalist Economy: A Gendered Post KeynesianInstitutional Analysis//. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA.

=9. Consumption and Market Demand= > //Journal of Economic Psychology,//25(5), 639-649
 * 1) Devetag, M. G. 1999. From Utilities to Mental Models: A Critical Survey on Decision Rules and Cognition in Consumer Choice. //Industrial and Corporate Change// 8.2: 289 – 351.
 * 2) Drakopoulos, S. A. 1994. Hierarchical Choice in Economics. //Journal of Economic Surveys// 8(2), 133-153.
 * 3) Fuller, C. G. 1996. Elements of a Post Keynesian Alternative to ’Household Production’. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 18 (Summer): 595 – 607.
 * 4) Hamilton, D. 1987. Institutional Economics and Consumption. // Journal of Economic Issues, //21(4), 1531-1554
 * 5) Lavoie, M. 2004. Post-Keynesian Consumer Theory: Potential Synergies with Consumer Research and Economic psychology
 * 1) Lavoie, M. 1994. A Post Keynesian Approach to Consumer Choice. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 16 (Summer): 539 – 562.
 * 2) Lavoie, M. 1992. //Foundations of Post–Keynesian Economic Analysis//. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, ch. 2
 * 3) Migone, A. 2007. Consumerism: Patterns of Consumption in Contemporary Capitalism. //Review of Radical Political Economics// 39(2), 173-200.
 * 4) Pietrykowski, B. 2009. //The Political Economy of Consumer Behavior: Contesting Consumption//. London: Routledge.
 * 5) Trigg, A. 2001. Veblen, Bourdieu, and Conspicuous Consumption. // Journal of Economic Issues, //35(1), 99-115
 * 6) Veblen, T. B. 1973. //The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions//. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.

=10. Industry and Market=
 * 1) Blair, J. M. 1972. //Economic Concentration: Structure, Behavior and Public Policy//. Harcourt Brace Javanovich, New York.
 * 2) Chester, L. 2010. Actually Existing Markets: The case of Neoliberal Australia. //Journal of Economic Issues// 44(2), 313-323.
 * 3) Fligstein, N. 1996. Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions. //American Sociological Review// 61(4), 656-673.
 * 4) Fligstein, N. 2001. //The Architecture of Markets//. Princeton University Press.
 * 5) Galbraith, J. K. 1967. //The New Industrial State//. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
 * 6) Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. //American Journal of Sociology// 91 (November): 481 – 510.
 * 7) Hamilton, W. H. (1974), Industrial Policy and Institutionalism, Augustus M. Kelley, New York.
 * 8) Hermann, A. 2008. The Institutional Analysis of the Market. //International Journal of Green Economics// 2.4: 379–391.
 * 9) Smelser, N. J. and Swedberg, R. (eds.). 1994. //The Handbook of Economic Sociology//. Princeton University Press, chs. 11 and 15.

=11. Competition=
 * 1) Baskoy, T. 2003. Thorstein Veblen’s Theory of Business Competition. //Journal of Economic Issues// 37(4), 1121-1137.
 * 2) Campbell, J., Hollingsworth, J., and Lindberg, L. (eds.) 1991. //Governance of the American Economy//. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chs. 1, 2, 11, 12.
 * 3) Clifton, J. A. 1987. Competitive Market Process, in //The New Palgrave// Vol. I A to D, pp. 553 – 556. Edited by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman. New York: Stockton Press.
 * 4) Grabher, G. (ed.) 1993. //The Embedded Firm//. London: Routledge, chs.1 – 2.
 * 5) Moss, S. 1981. //An Economic Theory of Business Strategy//. New York: John Wiley and Sons, chs. 5, 6, 7, and 8.
 * 6) Richardson, G. B. 1965. The Theory of Restrictive Trade Practices. //Oxford Economic Papers// 17 (November): 432 – 449.
 * 7) Robinson, J. V. 1933. //Economics of Imperfect Competition//. Macmillan, London.
 * 8) Robinson, J. V. 1934. What is Perfect Competition? //Quarterly Journal of Economics// 49(1), 104-120.
 * 9) Shapiro, N. 1997. Imperfect Competition and Keynes, in //A 'Second Edition' of The General Theory// Vol. I, pp. 83-92. Edited by G.C. Harcourt and P. Riach, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
 * 10) Shapiro, N. 2005. Competition and Aggregate Demand. //Journal of Post Keynesian Economics// 27 (3): 541-549.
 * 11) Shapiro, N. 2011. Competition, in //Elgar Companion to Radical Political Economy//. Edited by M. Sawyer and P. Arestis, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

=12. Corporate Governance, Market Governance, and Market Regulation=
 * 1) Chandler, A. D. 1977. //The Visible Hand//. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London, UK.
 * 2) Fligstein, N. 1990. //The Transformation of Corporate Control//. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
 * 3) Groenewegen, J. 2004. Who Should Control The Firm? Insights From New And Original Institutional Economics. //Journal of Economic Issues// 38(2), 353-361.
 * 4) Howe, M. 1972-73. A Study of Trade Association Price Fixing. //Journal of Industrial Economics// 21, 236-256.
 * Jo, T.-H. forthcoming. Saving Private Business Enterprises: A Heterodox Microeconomic Approach to Market Governance and Market Regulation. //The American Journal of Economics and Sociology//.
 * 1) Larner, W. 1997. The legacy of the social: Market governance and the consumer. //Economy and Society// 26(3), 373-399.
 * 2) Lazonick, W. and O’Sullivan, M. (2000), ’Maximizing Shareholder Value: A new ideology for corporate governance’, Economy and Society 29(1), 13-35.
 * 3) Meyer, P. B. 1986. The Corporate Person and Social Control: Responding to Deregulation. //Review of Radical Political Economics// 18(3), 65-84.
 * 4) Miller, E. S. 1996. Economic Regulation and New Technology in the Telecommunications Industry. //Journal of Economic Issues// 30(3), 719-733.
 * 5) Smelser, N. J. and Swedberg, R. (eds.) 1994. //The Handbook of Economic Sociology//. Princeton: Princeton University Press, ch. 18.
 * 6) Soederberg, S. 2010. //Corporate Power and Ownership in Contemporary Capitalism: The Politics of Resistance and Domination//. Routledge, London and New York.

=13. Heterodox Microfoundations and Modeling the Economy=
 * 1) Bergh, J. d. and Growdy, J. 2003. The Microfoundations of Macroeconomics: an Evolutionary Perspective. //Cambridge Journal of Economics// 27, 65-84.
 * 2) Bortis, H. 1997. //Institutions, Behaviour and Economic Theory//. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 * 3) Bortis, H. 2003. Marshall, the Keynesian revolution and Sraffa’s significance. //Journal of Economic Studies// 31(1), 77-97.
 * 4) Bortis, H. 2006. From Post Keynesian to Classical-Keynesian Political Economy: Luigi Pasinetti and the Gap between Keynes and Sraffa. European Society for the History of Economic Thought 10th Annual Conference, Porto, Spain.
 * 5) Bortis, H. 2003. Keynes and the Classics: Notes on the Monetary Theory of Production, in //Modern Theories of Money//, 411 – 474. Edited by L.-P. Rochon and S. Rossi. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
 * 6) Dow, S. C. 1985. Microfoundations: A Diversity of Treatments. //Eastern Economic Journal// XI(4), 342-360.
 * 7) Eatwell, J. And Milgate, M. 1983. Introduction In J. Eatwell and M. Milgate (eds.), //Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of value and Distribution//, 1–17. London: Duckworth.
 * 8) Eichner, A. 1976. //The Megacorp and Oligopoly//. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chs. 5, 7, 8.
 * 9) Eichner, A. S. 1987. //The Macrodynamics of Advanced Market Economies//. M.E. Sharpe, New York.
 * 10) Fleetwood, S. 2011. Sketching a socio-economic model of labour markets. //Cambridge Journal of Economics// 35, 15-38.
 * 11) Hayden, F. G. 1982. Social Fabric Matrix: From Perspective to Analytical Tool. //Journal of Economic Issues// 16(3), 637-662.
 * 12) Hayden, F. G. 2009. Utilization of the Social Fabric Matrix to Articulate a State System of Financial Aid, in Tara Natarajan; Wolfram Elsner and Scott Fullwiler, ed., //Institutional Analysis and Praxis: The Social Fabric Matrix Approach//. Springer, New York, pp. 209-235.
 * 13) Hodgson, G. M. 2000. From Micro to Macro: the Concept of Emergence and the Role of Institutions, in Leonardo Burlamaqui; Ana Calia Castro and Ha-Joon Chang, ed., ’Institutions and the Role of the State’, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, UK, pp. 103-126.
 * Jo, T.-H. 2007. Microfoundations of Effective Demand. PhD thesis, University of Missouri–Kansas City.
 * Jo, T.-H. 2011. Social Provisioning Process and Socio-Economic Modeling, //The American Journal of Economics and Sociology//, 70, 1094-1116
 * Jo, T.-H. 2011. A Heterodox Microfoundation of Business Cycles, in Joelle J. Leclaire; Tae-Hee Jo and Jane E. Knodell, ed., //Heterodox Analyses of Financial Crisis and Reform//. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.
 * 1) Kalecki, M. 1971. //Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalist Economy 1933-1970//. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 * 2) Kalecki, M. 1976. //Essays on Developing Economies//. The Harvester Press, Hassocks, UK.
 * 3) King, J. E. 2009. Microfoundations?, in Eckhard Hein; Torsten Niechoj and Engelbert Stockhamme, ed., //Macroeconomic Policies on Shaky Foundations: Whither Mainstream Economics//. Metropolis, Marburg, Germany.
 * 4) King, J. E. 2006. Imperfectionism in Macroeconomics: Old Light on a New Controversy. //Economic Issues// 11.2 (September): 39 – 49.
 * 5) Kregel, J. A. 1991. The Integration of Micro and Macroeconomics through Macrodynamic Megacorps, in William Milberg, ed., //The Megacorp and Macrodynamics//. M.E. Sharpe, New York, pp. 133-142.
 * 6) Kriesler, P. 1987. //Kalecki’s Microanalysis//. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 * 7) Kriesler, P. 1996. Microfoundations: a Kaleckian Perspective, in J.E. King, ed., //An Alternative Macroeconomic Theory: the Kaleckian Model and Post Keynesian Economics//. Kluwer, Massachussetes, pp. 55-72.
 * 8) Lavoie, M., Rochon, L.-P., and Seccareccia, M. 2010. //Money and Macrodynamics//, chs. 1, 2, 3, and 4
 * 9) Lee, F. S. 2011. Modeling the Economy as a Whole: An Integrative Approach, //The American Journal of Economics and Sociology//, 2011, 70(5), 1282-1314
 * 10) Lee, F. S. 2009. The Economics of the Industrial Workers of the World: Job control and revolution, in Frederic S. Lee and Jon Bekken, ed., //Radical Economics and Labor: Essays inspired by the IWW Centennial//. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 55-77.
 * 11) Lee, F. S. 2010. Alfred Eichner’s Missing “Complete Model”: A Heterodox Micro-Macro Model of a Monetary Production Economy, in Marc Lavoie; Louis-Philippe Rochon and Mario Seccareccia., ed., //Money and macrodynamics: Alfred Eichner and post-Keynesian economics//. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY and London, England, pp. 22-42.
 * 12) Lee, F. S. 1996. Pricing, the Pricing Model and Post–Keynesian Price Theory. //Review of Political Economy//8 (January): 87 – 99.
 * 13) Lee, F. S. 1998. //Post Keynesian Price Theory//, ch. 12.
 * 14) Lee, F. S. and Jo, T.-H. 2011. Social Surplus Approach and Heterodox Economics. //Journal of Economic Issues//, 45(4): 857-875
 * 15) Lutz, M. A. 1999. //Economics for the Common Good: Two Centuries of Social Economic Thought in the Humanistic Tradition//. London: Routledge, chs. 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11.
 * 16) Marcuzzo, M. C. 1996. Alternative Microeconomic Foundations for Macroeconomics: the controversy over the L-shaped cost curve revisited. //Review of Political Economy//8(1), 7-22.
 * 17) Milberg, W., ed. 1992. //The Megacorp and Macrodynamics: Essays in Memory of Alfred Eichner//. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.
 * 18) Mott, T. 1992. In What Sense Does Monopoly Capital Require Monopoly? An Essay on the Contribution of Kalecki and Steindl, in J. B. Davis, ed., //The Economic Surplus in Advanced Economies//. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, UK, pp. 114-129.
 * 19) O’Boyle, E. J. 1996. //Social Economics: Premises, Findings and Policies//. London: Routledge, chs. 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10.
 * 20) Sawyer, M. C. 1998. Kalecki’s Microfoundations: The Development of Kalecki’s Analysis of Pricing and Distribution, by Peter Kriesler’, //The Economic Journal// 98(389), 216-218.
 * 21) Shapiro, N. 1988. Market Structure and Economic Growth: Steindls Contribution. //Social Concept// 4.2 (June): 72 – 83.
 * 22) Trigg, A. B. 2008. Quantity and Price Systems: Toward a Framework for Coherence between Post-Keynesians and Sraffian Economics, in John T. Harvey and Jr. Robert F. Garnett, ed., //Future Directions for Heterodox Economics//. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 127-141.